Get started

Introduction

The fmeffects package computes, aggregates, and visualizes forward marginal effects (FMEs) for any supervised machine learning model. Read here how they are computed or the research paper for a more in-depth understanding. There are three main functions:

fme() computes FMEs for a given model, data, feature of interest, and step size
came() can be applied subsequently to find subspaces of the feature space where FMEs are more homogeneous
ame() provides an overview of the prediction function w.r.t. each feature by using average marginal effects (AMEs) based on FMEs.

Example

For demonstration purposes, we consider usage data from the Capital Bike Sharing scheme (Fanaee-T and Gama, 2014). It contains information about bike sharing usage in Washington, D.C. for the years 2011-2012 during the period from 7 to 8 a.m. We are interested in predicting count (the total number of bikes lent out to users).

library(fmeffects)
data(bikes, package = "fmeffects")
str(bikes)

## Classes 'data.table' and 'data.frame':   727 obs. of  11 variables:
##  $ season    : Factor w/ 4 levels "fall","spring",..: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
##  $ year      : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
##  $ month     : num  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
##  $ holiday   : Factor w/ 2 levels "True","False": 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
##  $ weekday   : Factor w/ 7 levels "Sun","Mon","Tue",..: 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 ...
##  $ workingday: Factor w/ 2 levels "True","False": 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 ...
##  $ weather   : Factor w/ 3 levels "clear","misty",..: 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 ...
##  $ temp      : num  8.2 16.4 5.74 4.92 7.38 6.56 8.2 6.56 3.28 4.92 ...
##  $ humidity  : num  0.86 0.76 0.5 0.74 0.43 0.59 0.69 0.74 0.53 0.5 ...
##  $ windspeed : num  0 13 13 9 13 ...
##  $ count     : num  3 1 64 94 88 95 84 9 6 77 ...
##  - attr(*, ".internal.selfref")=<externalptr>

FMEs are a model-agnostic interpretation method, i.e., they can be applied to any regression or (binary) classification model. Before we can compute FMEs, we need a trained model. The fme package supports models from the mlr3, tidymodels (parsnip) and caret libraries. Let’s try it with a random forest using the ranger algorithm:

set.seed(123)
library(mlr3verse)
library(ranger)
task = as_task_regr(x = bikes, id = "bikes", target = "count")
forest = lrn("regr.ranger")$train(task)

Compute FMEs

FMEs can be used to compute feature effects for both numerical and categorical features. This can be done with the fme() function.

Numerical Features

The most common application is to compute the FME for a single numerical feature, i.e., a univariate feature effect. The variable of interest must be specified with the feature argument. In this case, step.size can be any number deemed most useful for the purpose of interpretation. Most of the time, this will be a unit change, e.g., step.size = 1. As the concept of numerical FMEs extends to multivariate feature effects as well, fme() can be asked to compute a bivariate feature effect as well. In this case, feature needs to be supplied with the names of two numerical features, and step.size requires a vector, e.g., step.size = c(1, 1).

Univariate Feature Effects

Assume we are interested in the effect of temperature on bike sharing usage. Specifically, we set step.size = 1 to investigate the FME of an increase in temperature by 1 degree Celsius (°C). Thus, we compute FMEs for feature = "temp" and step.size = 1.

effects = fme(model = forest,
               data = bikes,
               target = "count",
               feature = "temp",
               step.size = 1,
               ep.method = "envelope")

Note that we have specified ep.method = "envelope". This means we exclude observations for which adding 1°C to the temperature results in the temperature value falling outside the range of temp in the overall data. Thereby, we reduce the risk of asking the model to extrapolate.

plot(effects, jitter = c(0.2, 0))

## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'

The black arrow indicates direction and magnitude of step.size. The horizontal line is the average marginal effect (AME). The AME is computed as a simple mean over all observation-wise FMEs. Therefore, on average, the FME of a temperature increase of 1°C on bike sharing usage is roughly 2.4. As can be seen, the observation-wise effects seem to vary for different values of temp. While the FME tends to be positive for lower temperature values (0-20°C), it turns negative for higher temperature values (>20°C).

Also, we can extract all relevant aggregate information from the effects object:

effects$ame

## [1] 2.364761

For a more in-depth analysis, we can inspect the FME for each observation in the data set:

head(effects$results)

##    obs.id       fme
## 1:      1  1.831311
## 2:      2  3.148305
## 3:      3  5.689283
## 4:      4 -0.942657
## 5:      5  2.081746
## 6:      6  4.813296

Bivariate Feature Effects

Bivariate feature effects can be considered when one is interested in the combined effect of two features on the target variable. Let’s assume we want to estimate the effect of a decrease in temperature by 3°C, combined with a decrease in humidity by 10 percentage points, i.e., the FME for feature = c("temp", "humidity") and step.size = c(−3, −0.1):

effects2 = fme(model = forest,
               data = bikes,
               target = "count",
               feature = c("temp", "humidity"),
               step.size = c(-3, -0.1),
               ep.method = "envelope")

plot(effects2, jitter = c(0.1, 0.02))

The plot for bivariate FMEs uses a color scale to indicate direction and magnitude of the estimated effect. Let’s check the AME:

effects2$ame

## [1] -2.796907

It seems that a combined decrease in temperature by 3°C and humidity by 10 percentage points seems to result in slightly lower bike sharing usage (on average). However, a quick check of the variance of the FMEs implies that effects are highly heterogeneous:

var(effects2$results$fme)

## [1] 591.1291

Therefore, it could be interesting to move the interpretation of feature effects from a global to a semi-global perspective via the came() function.

Categorical Features

For a categorical feature, the FME of an observation is simply the difference in predictions when changing the observed category of the feature to the category specified in step.size. For instance, one could be interested in the effect of rainy weather on the bike sharing demand, i.e., the FME of changing the feature value of weather to rain for observations where weather is either clear or misty:

effects3 = fme(model = forest,
              data = bikes,
              target = "count",
              feature = "weather",
              step.size = "rain")
summary(effects3)

## 
## Forward Marginal Effects Object
## 
## Step type:
##   categorical
## 
## Feature & reference category:
##   weather, rain
## 
## Extrapolation point detection:
##   none, EPs: 0 of 657 obs. (0 %)
## 
## Average Marginal Effect (AME):
##   -55.5029

Here, the AME of rain is -55. Therefore, while holding all other features constant, a change to rainy weather can be expected to reduce bike sharing usage by 55.
For categorical feature effects, we can plot the empirical distribution of the FMEs:

plot(effects3)

Model Overview with AMEs

For an informative overview of all feature effects in a model, we can use the ame() function:

overview = ame(model = forest,
           data = bikes,
           target = "count")
overview$results

##       Feature step.size       AME      SD      0.25     0.75   n
## 1      season    spring  -29.5627 30.3933  -38.9776    -6.47 548
## 2      season    summer    0.3712 22.2538   -8.3257  11.5291 543
## 3      season      fall   13.9269 28.0969   -0.2271  35.7786 539
## 4      season    winter   14.6231 24.5739    1.2331  25.8998 551
## 5        year         0 -100.0511 67.9522 -158.5412  -20.643 364
## 6        year         1   97.9793 61.0461   23.7845 149.0662 363
## 7       month         1    4.1008 13.1329   -1.2309   7.4386 727
## 8     holiday     False   -1.7886 21.8287   -9.6724   8.3443  21
## 9     holiday      True  -13.4861 25.6105  -32.4273   6.4777 706
## 10    weekday       Sat  -54.0185 48.8713  -85.2344 -16.5142 622
## 11    weekday       Sun  -82.8857 55.7827 -119.0325 -32.2624 622
## 12    weekday       Mon   10.1004 27.9977   -8.8229  30.4342 623
## 13    weekday       Tue   17.1576 24.7033    0.5063  32.5038 625
## 14    weekday       Wed   20.3346  22.484    1.3541  34.6645 623
## 15    weekday       Thu   19.5628 23.6865   -0.4163  35.5117 624
## 16    weekday       Fri    1.3505 35.6711  -25.4026  29.6176 623
## 17 workingday     False -204.8757 89.7998 -259.5304  -143.91 496
## 18 workingday      True  162.7476  63.766  121.3106 210.1368 231
## 19    weather     clear   26.0338 41.5209    3.8218  24.2506 284
## 20    weather     misty    3.0396 32.1851   -8.7945   1.1693 513
## 21    weather      rain  -55.5029 52.9214   -93.484  -3.5707 657
## 22       temp         1     2.341  7.1894   -0.5878   4.3155 727
## 23   humidity      0.01   -0.2617  2.7596   -0.3505    0.434 727
## 24  windspeed         1    0.0207  2.1497   -0.1694   0.2686 727

This computes the AME for each feature included in the model, with a default step size of 1 for numerical features (or, 0.01 if their range is smaller than 1). For categorical features, AMEs are computed for all available categories.
——

Semi-global Interpretations

We can use came() on a specific FME object to compute subspaces of the feature space where FMEs are more homogeneous. Let’s take the effect of a decrease in temperature by 3°C combined with a decrease in humidity by 10 percentage points, and see if we can find three appropriate subspaces.

subspaces = came(effects = effects2, number.partitions = 3)
summary(subspaces)

## 
## PartitioningCtree of an FME object
## 
## Method:  partitions = 3
## 
##    n      cAME  SD(fME)  
##  718 -2.796907 24.31315 *
##  649 -4.871194 22.35313  
##   49  6.346359 21.69575  
##   20 42.112717 39.89350  
## ---
## * root node (non-partitioned)
## 
## AME (Global): -2.7969

As can be seen, the CTREE algorithm was used to partition the feature space into three subspaces. The coefficient of variation (CoV) is used as a criterion to measure homogeneity in each subspace. We can see that the CoV is substantially smaller in each of the subspaces than in the root node, i.e., the global feature space. The conditional AME (cAME) can be used to interpret how the expected FME varies across the subspaces. Let’s visualize our results:

plot(subspaces)

In this case, we get a decision tree that assigns observations to a feature subspace according to the weather situation (weather) and the day of the week (weekday). The information contained in the boxes below the terminal nodes are equivalent to the summary output and can be extracted from subspaces$results. With cAMEs of -4.88, 4.16, and 25.68, respectively, the expected ME is estimated to vary substantially in direction and magnitude across the subspaces. For example, the cAME is highest on rainy days. It turns negative on non-rainy days in spring, summer and winter.