Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
X-Original-To: info@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: info@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-j.b-one.net (mx-j.one.com [91.198.169.57])
	by mail9.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500C840014C
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Wed,  5 Jan 2011 03:38:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx-j.b-one.net (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id 4507D65594A; Wed,  5 Jan 2011 03:38:41 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by one.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=0 required=4 tests=[none]
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from lists.maptools.org (lists.maptools.org [65.39.174.144]) by
 mx-j.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344FB65594A for
 <info@awaresystems.be>; Wed,  5 Jan 2011 03:38:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
 lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED158690D; Tue,  4 Jan 2011
 21:37:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org
 [65.66.246.74]) by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2188690B for
 <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2011 21:06:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org
 [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id
 p05266gA028838; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:06:06 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:06:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org
To: Lee Howard <faxguy@howardsilvan.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D237963.5050102@howardsilvan.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1101042004520.16459@freddy.simplesystems.org>
References: <201101011441.00281.even.rouault@mines-paris.org>
 <201101011453.42845.even.rouault@mines-paris.org>
 <4D228B81.2020709@howardsilvan.com>
 <201101042020.45499.even.rouault@mines-paris.org>
 <4D237963.5050102@howardsilvan.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2
 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:06:06 -0600
 (CST)
Cc: Tiff List <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB
 contig
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> I can certainly understand that at this point where we have a
> development branch and a maintenance branch that any new feature
> enhancements should go only into the development branch.  But in my mind
> bug-fixes go in both branches at least until the development branch cuts
> a versioned release.

I agree with the above.  In fact, even once 4.0 is formally released, 
we should still be willing to apply security fixes to 3.9.X on the 
branch.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
