Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
X-Original-To: info@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: info@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-i.b-one.net (mx-i.one.com [91.198.169.56])
	by mail9.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B367B40024F
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:54:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx-i.b-one.net (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id A45293D155F; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:54:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by one.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from lists.maptools.org (lists.maptools.org [65.39.174.144]) by
 mx-i.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2EA3D155F for
 <info@awaresystems.be>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:54:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
 lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DD41D18E51C; Thu, 17 Jun 2010
 19:54:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2AC1D0E52B6
 for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:33:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by
 gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42236FA433; Thu, 17 Jun
 2010 20:33:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by
 compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:33:53 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: 5CLWoqwzpDeFV19qCZ4MfsyDUoqv3G1ha5gfr2EYz4fG 1276821232
Received: from [192.168.1.125] (c-71-236-65-235.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
 [71.236.65.235]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
 A6CB44CFA7D; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:33:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C1ABEEF.7030701@spicenitz.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:33:51 -0400
From: Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9)
 Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivier Paquet <olivier.paquet@gmail.com>
References: <4C1A41A5.4070409@spicenitz.org>
 <alpine.GSO.2.01.1006171125140.12887@freddy.simplesystems.org>
 <4C1A4E8A.1060904@spicenitz.org>
 <alpine.GSO.2.01.1006171150230.12887@freddy.simplesystems.org>
 <4C1A5840.5000300@spicenitz.org>
 <AANLkTing-04iFpEr0k9-6DaA7DQFTRrFjOjdQ5g2RXM0@mail.gmail.com>
 <4C1A64CF.2060607@spicenitz.org>
 <alpine.GSO.2.01.1006171326540.12887@freddy.simplesystems.org>
 <AANLkTinwgIWMJfv8zKcO68ZHMQGK5sgyM3Pkwuw1K2_O@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinwgIWMJfv8zKcO68ZHMQGK5sgyM3Pkwuw1K2_O@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Cc: Tiff List <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0565884592=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--===============0565884592==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig80A2FA54C32817253625A5DE"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig80A2FA54C32817253625A5DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 06/17/2010 03:35 PM, Olivier Paquet wrote:
>=20
> Yes, TSD is probably the only thing that really scales. The downside
> is that it means we have to link with libpthread on linux. I'm not
> sure if that kind of change can safely be made once 4.0 is released so
> now might be a good time, even if we don't actually use libpthread
> yet.

You don't need TSD to scale. Just have mostly immutable structures that
you lock when you write to or pass to a different thread. Then
everything can work fine.

I'm pretty sure that if libtiff needs to compile with -pthread then we
are doing something wrong.


Adam


--------------enig80A2FA54C32817253625A5DE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwavu8ACgkQlenB4PQRJaxRQwCgp7m8Rzmw32IgIlToyltX07tz
198AnRGHur3S1LirASZV4y7IcbojeFPn
=O1f1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig80A2FA54C32817253625A5DE--

--===============0565884592==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
--===============0565884592==--
