Received: by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com (921026.SGI.NOSTRIP/911001.SGI)
	 id AA06557; Mon, 21 Jun 93 19:01:38 GMT
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com via SMTP (921026.SGI.NOSTRIP/911001.SGI)
	for /usr/people/sam/majordomo/wrapper resend -l tiff -h sgi.sgi.com -f tiff-owner -s -m "-oi -odq -om" tiff-list id AA06526; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:23 -0700
Received: from ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (920330.SGI/910110.SGI)
	for tiff-relay@whizzer.wpd.sgi.com id AA03197; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:19 -0700
Received: from SGI.COM by ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (5.63/1.43)
	id AA10911; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:10 -0700
Received: from relay.sgi.com by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (920330.SGI/910110.SGI)
	for ggallard%ucrvm2.bitnet%cmsa.berkeley.edu@ucbvax.berkeley.edu id AA03115; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:05 -0700
Received: from giraffe.asd.sgi.com by relay.sgi.com via SMTP (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @sgi.sgi.com:tiff@ucbvax.berkeley.edu id AA19095; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:02 -0700
Received: from flake.asd.sgi.com by giraffe.asd.sgi.com via SMTP (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @relay.sgi.com:ggallard%ucrvm2.bitnet%cmsa.berkeley.edu@ucbvax.berkeley.edu id AA13995; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:01:01 -0700
Received: from localhost.asd.sgi.com by flake.asd.sgi.com via SMTP (920330.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @giraffe.asd.sgi.com:tiff@ucbvax.berkeley.edu id AA12094; Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:00:59 -0700
Message-Id: <9306211900.AA12094@flake.asd.sgi.com>
To: Gerardo Gallardo    <GGALLARD%UCRVM2.BITNET%cmsa.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: tiff@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: TIF_LZW hash table size 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 07 Jun 93 10:58:03 +0500.
             <9306071701.AA05643@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:00:59 PDT
From: sam@flake.asd.sgi.com
Sender: tiff-owner@sgi.sgi.com

    To:      tiff@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
    Subject: TIF_LZW hash table size
    From:    Gerardo Gallardo <GGALLARD%UCRVM2.BITNET%cmsa.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
    Date:    Mon, 07 Jun 93 10:58:03 R

    Hi everybody,

    Today i 've been compiling the LZW module for DOS and using Turbo C 2.0
    and I found a problem. there is a hash table into an array of HSIZE size,
    but it is too large to be just an array. HSIZE is 9001, can it be a lower
    number without any problem ????

You can lower the number, but beware that making it too
small can significantly slow down the code.  You should
also be sure to choose your smaller number to be a prime
number.

	Sam






