Received: from mailgate002.isp.belgacom.be (mailgate002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.87])
	by maildelivery018.isp.belgacom.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE893AC1B5
	for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Fri,  1 Feb 2008 17:08:47 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: in.mx.skynet.be; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received: from r153.dmsolutions.ca (HELO duke.maptools.org) ([209.217.116.153])
  by in.mx.skynet.be with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 17:08:45 +0100
Received: from duke.maptools.org (duke.maptools.org [127.0.0.1])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m11FlApg013704;
	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:48:34 -0500
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m11Fl5UF013701
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:47:06 -0500
Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.65])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	m11FkQCI013020; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:46:27 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:46:26 -0600 (CST)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org
To: Ron <ron@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] TIFF T.30 vs TIFF Class F
In-Reply-To: <20080201090634.GA16823@homer.shelbyville.oz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0802010944120.3823@freddy.simplesystems.org>
References: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0801312158110.3823@freddy.simplesystems.org>
	<003001c864a9$2dfd8860$0202a8c0@awaredfg964ezf>
	<20080201090634.GA16823@homer.shelbyville.oz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.00002a4d
X-MSP-STORE: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:08:47 +0100
Status:   

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ron wrote:

> While I won't dispute Joris as a greater authority on what the TIFF
> specs have to say about this, I would suggest that if you are planning
> to send this to an actual FAX machine, the ITU spec (T.30) is going
> to have to take precedence (assuming you have a current, error free
> copy of that).

Ultimately the current ITU T specs refer to RFC 2301 
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2301.txt) so that is the document I will 
take as "gospel".

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
