Return-Path: <SRS0=f1nC=JN=lists.osgeo.org=tiff-bounces@osgeo.org>
Delivered-To: filtered@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx1.pub.mailpod8-cph3.one.com ([10.27.38.11])
	by mailstorage22.cst.mailpod8-cph3.one.com with LMTP
	id IBh+Kyycv2VEZgAAwT5NuQ
	(envelope-from <SRS0=f1nC=JN=lists.osgeo.org=tiff-bounces@osgeo.org>)
	for <filtered@awaresystems.be>; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:16:12 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=custmx.one.com; s=20201015;
	h=sender:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:from:list-subscribe:
	 list-help:list-post:list-unsubscribe:list-id:subject:mime-version:references:
	 message-id:in-reply-to:cc:to:date:x-halone-refid:x-halone-sa:from:x-halone-sa:
	 x-halone-refid;
	bh=B6hlEFw+Vsi/mJeUbu7VPj4vMrATR1Y0kFZw/guJm3s=;
	b=xqSg9FjfnDlygAZ+EthjZBxvB15kw7wlt60yxKbePAEC+n6MTGusqE1xz+dl/FpwMmBVR9IlawKU6
	 5B9QMRyYsjT6wN74BHZHeC/xx7p928MKl9bPKOfEaV1R8BL90a4STM9ZSmXWz2xZUKGLlqJtKZMRaB
	 kqOinDEus3RxFuFSQJczXp4xYaFxK3Wav82Xjh09WJLOcpvJWKSjEDXjhmGaG3Kv7hFbtulkrjuvKF
	 VaXW8BBxEouxR66IqqPTuXIjuzD24doZwpAEwaDL5iyjW2SyiBUBzQvzAL0zT0lekG9JqCRalodM04
	 jOV5kciZ6rmzQISUKiIAlLnjMxsTSxw==
X-HalOne-SA: -1
X-HalOne-RefID: 155866::1707056172-25B68CC2-5A082191/0/0
Authentication-Results: mx1.pub.mailpod8-cph3.one.com;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=osgeo.org smtp.remote-ip=140.211.15.3;
	dmarc=pass header.from=lists.osgeo.org;
X-HalOne-ID: f29fb2a2-c367-11ee-ab5f-98039b0f6c32
Received: from lists.osgeo.org (osgeo6.osgeo.osuosl.org [140.211.15.3])
	by mx1.pub.mailpod8-cph3.one.com (Halon) with ESMTP
	id f29fb2a2-c367-11ee-ab5f-98039b0f6c32;
	Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from osgeo6.osgeo.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lists.osgeo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA636146836;
	Sun,  4 Feb 2024 06:16:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.simplesystems.org (smtp.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90])
 by lists.osgeo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177FD6146800
 for <tiff@lists.osgeo.org>; Sun,  4 Feb 2024 06:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scrappy.simplesystems.org (scrappy.simplesystems.org
 [65.66.246.73])
 by smtp.simplesystems.org (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 414EG6Yt003583;
 Sun, 4 Feb 2024 08:16:06 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 08:16:06 -0600 (CST)
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@scrappy.simplesystems.org
To: Rob Tillaart <rob.tillaart@gmail.com>
cc: Patrice Fournier via Tiff <tiff@lists.osgeo.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANoujwEo4uxCEe5ZYGGDO0xgDsp_bfgijkjYJ+xXcgdDB5XAPw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.20.2402040812560.18702@scrappy.simplesystems.org>
References: <alpine.GSO.2.20.2402030845480.18702@scrappy.simplesystems.org>
 <bc24ea0d-8709-4a68-8575-3e517eed85ed@spatialys.com>
 <alpine.GSO.2.20.2402031001500.18702@scrappy.simplesystems.org>
 <d6bb4be0-8e65-497a-9cd2-7364401b85e4@ifax.com>
 <alpine.GSO.2.20.2402040743190.18702@scrappy.simplesystems.org>
 <CANoujwEo4uxCEe5ZYGGDO0xgDsp_bfgijkjYJ+xXcgdDB5XAPw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (GSO 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (smtp.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Sun, 04 Feb 2024 08:16:06 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.osgeo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.osgeo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/options/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.osgeo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.osgeo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.osgeo.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.osgeo.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Bob Friesenhahn via Tiff <tiff@lists.osgeo.org>
Reply-To: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.osgeo.org
Sender: "Tiff" <tiff-bounces@lists.osgeo.org>

On Sun, 4 Feb 2024, Rob Tillaart wrote:

>>  If the utilities are again maintained by the libtiff project, they
> need to be in a separate repository, with its own build process, and
> released distinctly from libtiff.  If this approach is not acceptable
> to libtiff maintainers, then the tools would need to be hosted
> elsewhere.
>
> Agree, maybe even create a project per tool?

Keep in mind that each new project creates an additional package to be 
separately maintained for OS distributions.  This is potentially more 
burden.

Common things such as a build/test infrastructure would need to be 
duplicated, and duplication is not a good thing.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Public Key,     http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
Tiff@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
