Received: from mailgate006.isp.belgacom.be (mailgate006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.5.212])
	by maildelivery012.isp.belgacom.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A5D25400A
	for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 17:29:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from r153.dmsolutions.ca (HELO duke.maptools.org) ([209.217.116.153])
  by in.mx.skynet.be with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2007 17:29:09 +0200
Received: from duke.maptools.org (duke.maptools.org [127.0.0.1])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l91FFpC4021793;
	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:16:14 -0400
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l91FErN5021776
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:14:54 -0400
Received: from freddy (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	l91FEnkZ026055; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:14:50 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:14:49 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy
To: Shivraj Patil <spatil@knightsindia.co.in>
Subject: RE: [Tiff] solaris x86-64 bit image port issue : Can not read TIFF
	directory count.
In-Reply-To: <49458FAE4B4045429CE5179601B250D619B515@ymmail.egcrystal.co.in>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0710011010260.1306@freddy>
References: <49458FAE4B4045429CE5179601B250D619B515@ymmail.egcrystal.co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.0000280d
X-MSP-STORE: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:29:10 +0200
Status:   

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Shivraj Patil wrote:

> Quiet interesting observation:
>
> If I compile the binaries without -m64 flag, things work fine.
>
> I believe the binaries will run under emulation mode in this case.

I am not sure about "emulation mode" since it seems to me that 32 bit 
apps on a 64-bit system is a common and well supported mode on Solaris 
(unlike some Linux).  Regardless, libtiff 3.9.0beta built using the 
-m64 flag (with GCC 4.2.1) is working fine for me under x86-64 
Solaris.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
