Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>
Received: from xserve.flids.com (adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net [65.83.169.202])
        by inmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id j5LHCm3J009320
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:12:49 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>)
Received: from adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8F2AC2650BC1; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:44:40 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Delivered-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD632650B9E
	for <tiff@remotesensing.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	j5LGiZAi007573; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:44:35 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:44:35 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@blade.simplesystems.org
To: Edward Lam <edward@sidefx.com>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] VS7.1 compile problems
In-Reply-To: <42B83BE8.6010700@sidefx.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.60.0506211138210.12047@blade.simplesystems.org>
References: <019301c57670$fee173d0$959877c6@cts1149>
	<Pine.SOC.4.60.0506211010290.12047@blade.simplesystems.org>
	<42B83BE8.6010700@sidefx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: tiff@remotesensing.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@remotesensing.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion  <tiff.remotesensing.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xserve.flids.com/pipermail/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@remotesensing.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.00000424
X-MSP-STORE: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:12:54 +0200
Status:   

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Edward Lam wrote:
>
> Isn't this because we're trying to compile that file as C code as opposed to 
> C++ code? The "inline" keyword is available in the C++ language only. What do 
> we do with gcc? Does gcc erroneously allow the "inline" keyword in the C 
> language?

In 1999 a new version of ANSI C was ratified which does include the 
'inline' key-word.  It seems that most compilers (even those preceding 
the update to the ANSI C standard) do include support for 'inline' or 
a variant thereof.

Parts of the code which are configured using autoconf receive the 
benefit of 'inline' configury.  Unfortunately, this does not include 
the Microsoft compiler.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@remotesensing.org
http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
