Received: by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (940707.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for tiff-list id LAA14781; Mon, 22 Aug 1994 11:40:57 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-tiff>
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com via ESMTP (940707.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for <tiff-relay@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> id LAA14775; Mon, 22 Aug 1994 11:40:53 -0700
Received: from corp.metasystems.com by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (940627.SGI.8.6.9/910110.SGI)
	for <tiff@sgi.com> id LAA05842; Mon, 22 Aug 1994 11:40:51 -0700
Received: from partner.metasystems.com by corp.metasystems.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for tiff@sgi.com id AA04128; Mon, 22 Aug 94 11:51:37 -0700
Received: by partner.metasystems.com (911016.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @corp.metasystems.com:tiff@sgi.com id AA00851; Mon, 22 Aug 94 11:41:53 -0700
From: "Dan Montoya" <montoya@partner.metasystems.com>
Message-Id: <9408221141.ZM849@partner.metasystems.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 1994 11:41:52 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail-SGI (3.0S.1026 26oct93 MediaMail)
To: tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: netpbm and libtiff
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

I have searched through the archives for the last 18 months and
have found nothing regarding new version of libtiff and netpbm.

Is libtiff 3.3 and netpbm compatible?

-- 
Dan Montoya



