Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
Received: from inas028.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by inav009.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-AV-3.00) with ESMTP id j88FwBAO017011
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:58:11 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from inmx014.isp.belgacom.be (inmx014.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.217])
        by inas028.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-AS-2.03) with ESMTP id j88Fw3DB000867
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:58:04 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from duke.maptools.org (r153.dmsolutions.ca [209.217.116.153] (may be forged))
        by inmx014.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id j88Fw2F9005673
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:58:02 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from duke.maptools.org (duke.maptools.org [127.0.0.1])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88Fqf7L003370;
	Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:52:44 -0400
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88FqY0K003367
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:52:34 -0400
Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	j88FqU8a027148; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:52:30 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:52:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@blade.simplesystems.org
To: Dan Smith <dan.everest@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] problem using 64-bit libtiff.so on Solaris 8 using GCC
In-Reply-To: <431C6C86.9000700@adelphia.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.60.0509081048430.13765@blade.simplesystems.org>
References: <431C6C86.9000700@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.00000bc2
X-MSP-STORE: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:58:18 +0200
Status:   

On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Dan Smith wrote:
>   I am using gcc v3.3.3, Solaris 8 & libtiff v3.5.7.  I realize 3.7.3 is the 
> latest, but upgrading to the latest libraries a few weeks before a release is 
> not advisable unless absolutely necessary.  Besides, I can't beleive I am the 
> only one to try libtiff in 64-bit mode on GNU.

I use libtiff 3.7.3 compiled as 64-bits under Solaris 9 using GCC 
4.0.1.  There are some warnings during compilation, but the library 
seems to work correctly anyway.

I don't recommend that anyone use libtiff v3.5.7 if they have the 
option to use 3.7.3 since 3.7.3 is more portable, more modern, and 
fixes many bugs.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
