Received: by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com (/911001.SGI)
	 id AA16507; Tue, 15 Feb 94 12:34:33 GMT
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com via SMTP (/911001.SGI)
	for /usr/people/sam/majordomo/wrapper resend -l tiff -h sgi.sgi.com -f tiff-owner -s -m "-oi -odq -om" tiff-list id AA16500; Tue, 15 Feb 94 04:34:30 -0800
Received: from alpha.Xerox.COM by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/910110.SGI)
	for tiff-relay@whizzer.wpd.sgi.com id AA14683; Tue, 15 Feb 94 04:34:28 -0800
Received: from Ireland.Roch803.Xerox.xns by alpha.xerox.com via XNS id <14411(1)>; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 04:34:21 PST
X-Ns-Transport-Id: 080037006252B45B3107
Date: 	Tue, 15 Feb 1994 04:33:17 PST
From: Claude_S._Fillion.ROCH803@xerox.com
Subject: Re: TIFFGetField bug
To: tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Cc: claude@roch803.mc.xerox.com
Reply-To: Fillion.Roch803@xerox.com
Message-Id: <"15-Feb-94  7:32:57".*.Claude_S._Fillion.ROCH803@Xerox.com>
Sender: tiff-owner@sgi.sgi.com

I found out why I was getting incorrect values returned from GetField,  strip
chop support is enabled by default.  Strip chop support seems like a feature
that could use some work.  One of the files I was testing with was only 5k and
has a correct rowsperstrip value of 200.  Strip chop support changed the
rowsperstrip to 372.  I would have assumed that if a file size is under 8k the
rowsperstrip value would not be changed.

Thanks,
claude@roch803.mc.xerox.com





