Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
Received: from inas007.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by inav018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-AV-3.00) with ESMTP id j8ONDsom001694
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:13:54 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from inmx005.isp.belgacom.be (inmx005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.148])
        by inas007.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-AS-2.03) with ESMTP id j8ONDi93013215
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:13:44 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from duke.maptools.org (r153.dmsolutions.ca [209.217.116.153] (may be forged))
        by inmx005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id j8ONDhmZ012982
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:13:43 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>)
Received: from duke.maptools.org (duke.maptools.org [127.0.0.1])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8ON9h3F019310;
	Sat, 24 Sep 2005 19:10:22 -0400
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8ON9fH8019307
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 19:09:41 -0400
Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	j8ON9d8a012335; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:09:39 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:09:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@blade.simplesystems.org
To: Leonard Rosenthol <leonardr@pdfsages.com>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20050924160049.04d90de0@mail1.netreach.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.60.0509241807010.19359@blade.simplesystems.org>
References: <931f8ea905092314116e0918ce@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.SOC.4.60.0509231618360.19359@blade.simplesystems.org>
	<p05210601bf5a2f276517@[153.32.48.223]>
	<6.2.3.4.2.20050924160049.04d90de0@mail1.netreach.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: TIFF <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.00000c5c
X-MSP-STORE: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:13:59 --21-99
Status:   

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:

>> But it doesn't have quite the flexibility that TIFF needs.
>
>        How so?
>
>        In so much as tiled support or something else?

I second this question since JPEG is already supported by TIFF and 
JPEG could be viewed as less flexible than JPEG2000.

There are already vendors storing JPEG2000 in TIFF.  Of course that 
does not mean it is a good idea.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
