Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
X-Original-To: info@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: info@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-n.b-one.net (mx-n.one.com [91.198.169.61])
	by mail9.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DC440021F
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:09:13 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by one.com
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=0 required=6 tests=[none]
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from lists.maptools.org (lists.maptools.org [65.39.174.144])
	by mx-n.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40FD8C68F5
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:09:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5DB1CEE131A;
	Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net (eastrmmtao105.cox.net [68.230.240.47])
	by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6940A1D18896B
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:03:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net
	(InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id
	<20081221160321.ILJF14968.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>;
	Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:03:21 -0500
Received: from glerbl ([68.100.191.139]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id ts3M1a00130uX7o02s3M7y; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:03:21 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=kDcmBLm7kIgA:10 a=1R4-5VS1SbcA:10
	a=l4aQWd-FAAAA:8 a=26iZIfDCiOQ8kUX4BvcA:9 a=D4m5heO8anHvsBo7iTEA:7
	a=g9arayiSdA5NjR4h4t-OYV7KZD8A:4 a=qIVjreYYsbEA:10 a=iYlkOlhu7C0A:10
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Received: from soup ([10.160.59.17] helo=soup.q.qbilt.org)
	by glerbl with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <ejb@ql.org>)
	id 1LEQm0-00032j-SX; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:03:20 -0500
Received: from ejb by soup.q.qbilt.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ejb@ql.org>)
	id 1LEQm0-0007SW-Vi; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:03:20 -0500
From: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
To: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam@pobox.com>
References: <4949D804.5010103@pobox.com>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0812172323350.4741@freddy.simplesystems.org>
	<4949E6EB.2090209@pobox.com>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0812181011050.4741@freddy.simplesystems.org>
	<494A9D7B.9040804@pobox.com> <494A9ECA.3060704@howardsilvan.com>
	<494AA267.6090205@pobox.com> <494AA45C.4010206@howardsilvan.com>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0812181435410.4741@freddy.simplesystems.org>
	<494AC706.8030501@pobox.com>
Message-ID: <20081221110320.0459386655.qww314159@soup.q.qbilt.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:03:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <494AC706.8030501@pobox.com> (Frank Warmerdam's message of "Thu, 
	18 Dec 2008 16:56:22 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.160.59.17
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ejb@ql.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on glerbl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: TIFF mailing list <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] 3.9.0 release,
	Was:  tiffvers.h - TIFFLIB_RELEASE macro addition
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org

Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam@pobox.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I have committed changes that I believe correct the ABI problem:
>
>    http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1979
>
> I have tested processing a file with 8bit unassociated alpha values, and
> that seems fine.  But I don't have any 16bit files with/without associated
> alpha that I am aware of for testing.  If anyone would like to try tiff2rgba
> in the 3.9 branch with 16bit files that might be helpful.
>
> Is anyone aware of any other serious issues with the 3.9 branch?  If not,
> I'd like to produce a 3.9.0 release candidate for testing.

See

http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1980

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
