Received: from mailgate002.isp.belgacom.be (mailgate002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.87])
	by maildelivery005.isp.belgacom.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BB16405B
	for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Sat, 24 May 2008 06:47:49 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: in.mx.skynet.be; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received: from r153.dmsolutions.ca (HELO duke.maptools.org) ([209.217.116.153])
  by in.mx.skynet.be with ESMTP; 24 May 2008 06:47:48 +0200
Received: from duke.maptools.org (duke.maptools.org [127.0.0.1])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m4O4V2Ll006893;
	Sat, 24 May 2008 00:32:15 -0400
Received: from netserver.pc-backup.net (netserver.pc-backup.net [65.86.65.107])
	by duke.maptools.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m4O4UvEW006890
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:30:58 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (pcbr.pc-backup.net [65.86.65.110])
	by netserver.pc-backup.net (8.11.6/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with
	ESMTP id m4O4REe08365; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:27:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [Tiff] Unitialized Variable Caused a Problem in TIFFCP
From: Gene Amtower <gene@pc-backup.com>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0805232011240.14523@freddy.simplesystems.org>
References: <1211568911.4192.237.camel@PCB-Bench-01>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0805231634110.14523@freddy.simplesystems.org>
	<1211586647.4192.244.camel@PCB-Bench-01>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0805232011240.14523@freddy.simplesystems.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: PC Backup
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 00:30:53 -0400
Message-Id: <1211603453.8617.7.camel@PCB-Bench-01>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gene@pc-backup.com
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
X-UIDL: 000000000023ceae.00002cfb
X-MSP-STORE: Sat, 24 May 2008 06:47:49 +0200
Status:   

On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:15 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> There is about 3 years of difference.  But both of them are old now. 
> Needless to say, fixes appear in subsequent releases, so it is best to 
> see if the problem still exists in 3.9.0beta and 4.0.0beta1 so that it 
> can be fixed before the next release.

Bob,

I downloaded all of the pre-release versions from 3.9.0 and later, and
they all share the same situation with the uninitialized samples/pixel
variable.  I also read through some of the ChangeLog entries, and it's
obvious that there's lots of activity, but just not focused in the areas
where I'm working - see about 4 people working pretty regularly on the
package including you.

Hmm, I still don't see anything about a watermarking function in tiffcp,
so my current work on watermarking is not for naught.  (Is that a double
negative?)

   Gene

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
