Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org>
X-Original-To: info@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: info@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-i.b-one.net (mx-i.one.com [91.198.169.56])
	by mail9.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D3B40024C
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:19:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx-i.b-one.net (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id BAA31FA94F; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by one.com
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from lists.maptools.org (lists.maptools.org [65.39.174.144]) by
 mx-i.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751AE3515C8 for
 <info@awaresystems.be>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:18:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
 lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0C286B22; Fri, 15 Apr 2011
 04:16:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be
 [195.238.6.179]) by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61686C02 for
 <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:42:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
Received: from 193.124-180-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO [192.168.1.101])
 ([91.180.124.193]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2011 10:42:39 +0200
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:41:50 +0200
From: Igor Skochinsky <skochinsky@mail.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <3638118.20110415104150@mail.ru>
To: Graeme Gill <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DA7AF36.70806@argyllcms.com>
References: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1104112058300.10593@freddy.simplesystems.org>
 <4DA4502A.2090207@sidefx.com>
 <alpine.GSO.2.01.1104120821110.10593@freddy.simplesystems.org>
 <4DA47607.5030505@sidefx.com> <4DA48656.4070509@howardsilvan.com>
 <4DA49360.5070905@sidefx.com> <4DA50AC4.7000001@argyllcms.com>
 <4DA5A03D.9060002@sidefx.com> <4DA7AF36.70806@argyllcms.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Tiff] Bug 1941, Was:  Libtiff v4.0.0beta7 released
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Igor Skochinsky <skochinsky@mail.ru>
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
 <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org

Hello Graeme,

Friday, April 15, 2011, 4:36:38 AM, you wrote:

GG> Edward Lam wrote:
>> Doesn't MingGW32 avoid the use of side by side assemblies?

GG> It does, but it's a significantly slower compiler, so it's not
GG> much fun for development (I'd say about 5 x slower).

GG> I'm sure VC++6 will fade into obscurity - I'm just pointing
GG> out a concrete reason why it is still around, even though
GG> it is so old.

VC10 is back to simplified runtime DLL deployment.

http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2010/03/24/visual-studio-2010-changes-for-vc-part-5/

-- 
WBR,
 Igor                            mailto:skochinsky@mail.ru

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
