Received: by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com (/911001.SGI)
	 id AA17870; Wed, 1 Dec 93 20:09:26 GMT
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com via SMTP (/911001.SGI)
	for /usr/people/sam/majordomo/wrapper resend -l tiff -h sgi.sgi.com -f tiff-owner -s -m "-oi -odq -om" tiff-list id AA17861; Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:09:23 -0800
Received: from Sun.COM by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/910110.SGI)
	for tiff-relay@whizzer.wpd.sgi.com id AA16351; Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:09:20 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA25503; Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:08:35 PST
Received: from chopin.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA10356; Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:07:12 PST
Received: by chopin.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA27589; Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:07:42 PST
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 93 12:07:42 PST
From: Frances.Ho@Eng.Sun.COM (Frances Ho)
Message-Id: <9312012007.AA27589@chopin.Eng.Sun.COM>
To: tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: 3.2beta on Sun
Sender: tiff-owner@sgi.sgi.com



I seem to be having problem getting a good copy of 3.2 beta libtiff that runs
on SunOS 4.1.1.

I'm using the Makefile.sun that was included with 3.2beta, and the ANSI C
compiler from SPARCworks (acc) version 2.0.  The library gets compiled fine
with some very minor ANSI changes (I'm using the -Xa option with acc).  I
then compile the new tiff2ps program and link with the new library.  Using
the same TIFF file, the output from the new tiff2ps is about 100,000 bytes
less than the 3.0 tiff2ps output, and the new output is totally garbled.
What did I do wrong?  I haven't applied the patches yet, but I didn't think
that the base 3.2beta won't even produce without the patches.

Thanks in advance.



-Frances


