Received: by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for tiff-list id AAA26519; Fri, 16 Sep 1994 00:15:38 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-tiff>
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for <tiff-relay@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> id AAA26514; Fri, 16 Sep 1994 00:15:32 -0700
Received: from en.ecn.purdue.edu by sgi.sgi.com via ESMTP (940627.SGI.8.6.9/910110.SGI)
	for <tiff@sgi.com> id AAA08197; Fri, 16 Sep 1994 00:15:31 -0700
Received: from en.ecn.purdue.edu (davisonj@localhost)
	by en.ecn.purdue.edu (8.6.8/3.5davy)
	id CAA26486; Fri, 16 Sep 1994 02:15:29 -0500
Message-Id: <199409160715.CAA26486@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
From: John M Davison <davisonj@ecn.purdue.edu>
Subject: TransferFunction Question
To: tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 02:15:27 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 344       
Sender: owner-tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

        Does it make any sense to specify a TransferFunction when any of the
non-extra samples have a SampleFormat that is not equal to 1 (unsigned integer
data)?  The TIFF 6.0 Specification is not clear on this.

-- 
John Davison
Electronic Mail: davisonj@ecn.purdue.edu
WWW Home Page: <http://en.ecn.purdue.edu:20002/~davisonj/HomePage.html>

