Received: by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (941129.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for tiff-list id KAA03617; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 10:44:13 -0800
Return-Path: <owner-tiff>
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com via ESMTP (941129.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	for <tiff-relay@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> id JAA26413; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 09:11:41 -0800
Received: from mcgltd.demon.co.uk by sgi.sgi.com via SMTP (941129.SGI.8.6.9/910110.SGI)
	for <tiff@sgi.com> id JAA09963; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 09:11:23 -0800
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 16:45:25 GMT
From: Raymond@mcgltd.demon.co.uk (Raymond Wilson)
Reply-To: Raymond@mcgltd.demon.co.uk
Message-Id: <1122@mcgltd.demon.co.uk>
To: tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: Prior post RE: Compiling LIBTIFF in MSDOS...
X-Mailer: PCElm 1.10
Lines: 19
Sender: owner-tiff@sgi.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Err... Oops... Excuse me while I remove foot from mouth.

BCC v4.02 DOES define short as a TWO byte signed integer, not a 
ONE byte signed integer. I assumed when the help said 'Use the 
short type modifier when you want a variable smaller than an 
int', it meant an 8-bit type since I am compiling a 16 bit 
application (where int = 16 bits). This is in fact only true 
when compiling a 32 bit application (where int = 32 bits).

Regards,

Raymond.

-- 
Raymond Wilson,      Software Engineer.      Morgan Collis Group Ltd,
                                             The Mill, Millbrook Close,
Yes, they ARE fond of mills here!            St. James Mill Rd, 
Ph: +44 604 580-980  Fax: +44 604 589-208    Northampton NN5 5JF, Britain.




