Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>
Received: from inmx006.isp.belgacom.be (inmx006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.106])
        by mailst034.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-MAILSTORE-2.14) with ESMTP id i95Eaijr006685
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:36:44 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>)
Received: from xserve.flids.com (adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net [65.83.169.202])
        by inmx006.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id i95EYdSw013072
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:34:40 +0200
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>)
Received: from adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3BB5C355D77; Tue,  5 Oct 2004 10:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Delivered-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Received: from visa.com (portal3.visa.com [198.80.42.3])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD098355D54
	for <tiff@remotesensing.org>; Tue,  5 Oct 2004 10:34:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ([10.72.86.29])
	by portal3.visa.com with ESMTP  id 133030150.20539135;
	Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:34:00 -0700
Received: from sw720ex016.visa.com ([10.72.11.170]) by sw720ex001.visa.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); 
	Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:34:00 -0700
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
Subject: RE: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:41:32 -0700
Message-ID: <4BCF88971C5D964094550DF1B35532A8043B7237@sw720ex016.visa.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue
Thread-Index: AcSqPuznsexnzy8BS+CiNPoBlvrFDAAARyMQACnmssA=
From: "Loygorri, Fernando" <FLoygorr@inovant.com>
To: "Tiff mailing list" <tiff@remotesensing.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2004 14:34:00.0963 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[5B086D30:01C4AAE8]
X-BeenThere: tiff@remotesensing.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion  <tiff.remotesensing.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xserve.flids.com/pipermail/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@remotesensing.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
X-UIDL: 43e21d5586555b59defd87d00f698dd8

This reminds me to ask: Is BigTIFF going to be documented as a baseline =
feature
in the new specification (I hope so) or as an extension in the sense of =
"Part
2: TIFF Extensions" (I hope not).

As for the file extension, all of the arguments I've heard make me =
believe that
we will be better served keeping the existing ones and not creating new =
ones.

Regards,

--=20
FGL=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
> [mailto:tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org]On Behalf Of Bill Bither
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:30 AM
> To: Tiff mailing list
> Subject: RE: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue
>=20
>=20
> I just want to make the point that there are already many flavors of
> TIFF files that many standard "image viewer" applictions do not open.
> For example, old style JPEG, CIELab, JBIG compressed TIFF's, Tiled
> TIFF's, etc, etc.  Whether we like it or not, that's the way TIFF is.
> Why change that philosophy now and create a new extension?=20
>=20
> I don't recall that point being brought up.
>=20
> Regards,
> Bill Bither
> Atalasoft
> www.atalasoft.com
=20
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
Tiff@remotesensing.org
http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff
