Return-Path: <awaresystems.be+caf_=filtered=awaresystems.be@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: filtered@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-h.one.com (mx-h.one.com [91.198.169.55])
	by mail6.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAAB8010728F
	for <filtered@awaresystems.be>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:47:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by one.com
Received-SPF: pass (mx-h: domain of awaresystems.be+caf_=filtered=awaresystems.be@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2
Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49])
	by mx-h.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2894BBA70F
	for <filtered@awaresystems.be>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:47:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r6so3094338vbi.22
        for <filtered@awaresystems.be>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.220.225.132 with SMTP id is4mr11718696vcb.47.1355968051177;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: filtered@awaresystems.be
X-Forwarded-For: awaresystems.be@gmail.com filtered@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: awaresystems.be@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.144.166 with SMTP id sn6csp54394veb;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.12.200 with SMTP id a8mr12044135vec.52.1355968049712;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 91.198.169.58 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org) client-ip=91.198.169.58;
Received: by 10.230.202.193 with POP3 id ff1mf2000688vbb.13;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Gmail-Fetch-Info: info@awaresystems.be 1 pop.awaresystems.be 110 info@awaresystems.be
Delivered-To: info@awaresystems.be
Received: from mx-k.one.com (mx-k.one.com [91.198.169.58])
	by mail6.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935548014E860
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:36:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2
Received: from lists.maptools.org (ks365428.kimsufi.com [94.23.4.142])
	by mx-k.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678B46D75F4
	for <info@awaresystems.be>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:36:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.0.241] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A9635C052;
	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:34:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from poplet3.per.eftel.com (poplet3.per.eftel.com [203.24.100.44])
	by lists.maptools.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BCF35C052
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (203.123.90.227.static.rev.eftel.com
	[203.123.90.227])
	by poplet3.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C6637A23
	for <tiff@lists.maptools.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:09:26 +0800 (WST)
Message-ID: <50D26546.3070405@argyllcms.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:09:26 +1100
From: Graeme Gill <graeme2@argyllcms.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: libtiff - Liste <tiff@lists.maptools.org>
References: <17803.1355936577@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<alpine.GSO.2.01.1212191124020.882@freddy.simplesystems.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1212191124020.882@freddy.simplesystems.org>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] CVS server unreachable?
X-BeenThere: tiff@lists.maptools.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: graeme@argyllcms.com
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion <tiff.lists.maptools.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/private/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@lists.maptools.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@lists.maptools.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@lists.maptools.org

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I would be much happier if libtiff was updated to use Mercurial (Hg) 
> or Git because then every checkout would include full history and 
> would serve as a backup of the master repository.  I have a preference 
> for Mercurial because it is easy to learn and relatively simple.

Fossil ? - probably simpler to use than either Git or Hg.

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list: Tiff@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
