Return-Path: <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>
Received: from inmx010.isp.belgacom.be (inmx010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.73])
        by mailst035.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-MAILSTORE-2.14) with ESMTP id iBALuZlw007574
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:56:35 +0100
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>)
Received: from xserve.flids.com (adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net [65.83.169.202])
        by inmx010.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id iBALuQp6030054
        for <joris.at.lebbeke@skynet.be>; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:56:28 +0100
        (envelope-from <tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org>)
Received: from adsl-065-083-169-202.sip.mco.bellsouth.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D7BB24F774E; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:56:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Delivered-To: tiff@remotesensing.org
Received: from scooby.simplesystems.org (scooby.simplesystems.org
	[65.66.246.67])
	by xserve.flids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CAC4F7727
	for <tiff@remotesensing.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:56:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74])
	by scooby.simplesystems.org (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	iBALu9jt017318; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:56:09 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:56:09 -0600 (CST)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
X-X-Sender: bfriesen@blade.simplesystems.org
To: Andrey Kiselev <dron@ak4719.spb.edu>
Subject: Re: [Tiff] Q: writing tiled TIFFs
In-Reply-To: <20041210214748.GC14687@ak4719.spb.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.60.0412101554350.4000@blade.simplesystems.org>
References: <BDDBEC9A.2C99E%eric.vergnaud@jlynx.com>
	<6.2.0.14.2.20041207212848.02cd6880@pop.earthlink.net>
	<b35303704120801317626cafb@mail.gmail.com>
	<6.2.0.14.2.20041208073835.02cf9be8@pop.earthlink.net>
	<000c01c4dd24$40ed9650$7abaf551@dfgrrxsknr4e>
	<6.2.0.14.2.20041208212744.02dac138@pop.earthlink.net>
	<001701c4ddd7$a0a76a90$9fb4f551@dfgrrxsknr4e>
	<6.2.0.14.2.20041209074326.02d21670@pop.earthlink.net>
	<000e01c4ddf1$a68b2450$b1b7f551@dfgrrxsknr4e>
	<6.2.0.14.2.20041209082217.02d2c7c8@pop.earthlink.net>
	<20041210214748.GC14687@ak4719.spb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: tiff@remotesensing.org
X-BeenThere: tiff@remotesensing.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: TIFF and libtiff discussion  <tiff.remotesensing.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xserve.flids.com/pipermail/tiff>
List-Post: <mailto:tiff@remotesensing.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff>,
	<mailto:tiff-request@remotesensing.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
Errors-To: tiff-bounces@remotesensing.org
X-UIDL: 6d71831f390f002159f6b89cf7447d0b

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Andrey Kiselev wrote:
>
> libtiff uses 256x256 tiles by default, but specification does not define
> any default value for this tag, so it is better to set this values
> manually. I can add logic to limit the tile size by the image
> dimensions, but I'm not sure it is necessary.

I think that software exists which is designed for particular tile 
sizes and libtiff should not impose any arbitrary limit, even if the 
size of the tile is larger than the image itself.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
Tiff@remotesensing.org
http://xserve.flids.com/mailman/listinfo/tiff
