This workflow measures data perturbation when transforming variables across geographic boundaries. The process reveals two critical decision points typically left implicit in applied work, maintaining variable agnosticism throughout.
## --- load toy baseline (relationship-defined) ---
acs_path <- system.file("extdata", "toy_acs_zcta_hennepin.csv", package = "geoDeltaAudit")
stopifnot(nchar(acs_path) > 0)
acs_zcta_hennepin <- readr::read_csv(acs_path, show_col_types = FALSE) %>%
janitor::clean_names() %>%
dplyr::mutate(zcta = stringr::str_pad(as.character(.data$zcta), 5, pad = "0"))
# Toy assoc: 1:1 ZCTA -> ZIP (same 5-digit IDs)
zcta_zip_hennepin <- acs_zcta_hennepin %>%
dplyr::distinct(.data$zcta) %>%
dplyr::transmute(zcta = .data$zcta, zip = .data$zcta) %>%
dplyr::distinct()
assoc_structure <- zcta_zip_hennepin %>%
dplyr::summarise(
n_rows = dplyr::n(),
n_zctas = dplyr::n_distinct(.data$zcta),
n_zips = dplyr::n_distinct(.data$zip)
)
assoc_structure## # A tibble: 1 × 3
## n_rows n_zctas n_zips
## <int> <int> <int>
## 1 74 74 74
diagnostics <- audit_association(assoc_table) print(diagnostics)
unmapped <- acs_zcta_hennepin %>%
dplyr::anti_join(zcta_zip_hennepin %>% dplyr::distinct(.data$zcta), by = "zcta")
fanout_stats <- zcta_zip_hennepin %>%
dplyr::count(.data$zcta, name = "n_zip") %>%
dplyr::summarise(
min = min(.data$n_zip),
median = median(.data$n_zip),
mean = mean(.data$n_zip),
max = max(.data$n_zip)
)
list(
n_unmapped_zctas = nrow(unmapped),
fanout = fanout_stats
)## $n_unmapped_zctas
## [1] 0
##
## $fanout
## # A tibble: 1 × 4
## min median mean max
## <int> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
## 1 1 1 1 1
Crosswalks are directional allocations (not inverses) This audit treats each step as a one-way transformation and reports loss/fan-out at each stage
This vignette shows how geoDeltaAudit separates
data values from geographic transformation
rules.
The maps above visualize how identical source values can yield different spatial memberships depending on whether boundaries are defined by relationships or geometry. The numerical audit steps in other vignettes quantify the downstream effects of these choices.
This vignette shows how geoDeltaAudit separates
data values from geographic transformation
rules.
The maps above visualize how identical source values can yield different spatial memberships depending on whether boundaries are defined by relationships or geometry. The numerical audit steps in other vignettes quantify the downstream effects of these choices.
This vignette is intentionally visual and descriptive. It does not perform transformations or inference.